Redesign Facebook Like Button BETTER
Facebook announced changes to their "Share" and "Like" buttons on Wednesday, the first time the "Like" button has been redesigned since its introduction in 2010. (Full disclosure: The Huffington Post was a launch partner on the redesign.)
redesign facebook like button
Download Zip: https://www.google.com/url?q=https%3A%2F%2Furloso.com%2F2tLBsu&sa=D&sntz=1&usg=AOvVaw2nx7Ggywp5tkDRRQ4exW-H
While the aesthetic switch may seem minor, consider just how ubiquitous these buttons are across the Internet. Collectively, they are seen more than 22 billion times a day on more than 7.5 million websites, helping Facebook's referral traffic top that of all other social networks combined, according to a Shareaholic report. The redesigned logos get rid of the signature Facebook thumb for a pronounced blue color palette and the "F" Facebook logo.
Facebook has also made it easier for websites to include the Like and Share buttons side-by-side and says that it has seen an increase in the number of Likes and Shares throughout its testing of the redesign.
Facebook has removed the like button from its redesigned public pages used by artists, public figures and brands, the social media company said on Wednesday. This is a pretty big change and now it will instead focus more on the news feed for conversations, rather than highlighting the likes on FB pages.
A like button, like option, or recommend button, is a feature in communication software such as social networking services, Internet forums, news websites and blogs where the user can express that they like, enjoy or support certain content.[1] Internet services that feature like buttons usually display the number of users who liked each content, and may show a full or partial list of them. This is a quantitative alternative to other methods of expressing reaction to content, like writing a reply text. Some websites also include a dislike button, so the user can either vote in favor, against or neutrally. Other websites include more complex web content voting systems. For example, five stars or reaction buttons to show a wider range of emotion to the content.
Video sharing site Vimeo added a "like" button in November 2005.[2] Developer Andrew Pile describes it as an iteration of the "digg" button from the site Digg.com, saying "We liked the Digg concept, but we didn't want to call it 'Diggs,' so we came up with 'Likes'".[2]
The like button on FriendFeed was announced as a feature on October 30, 2007 and was popularized within that community.[3] Later the feature was integrated into Facebook before FriendFeed was acquired by Facebook on August 10, 2009.[4]
The Facebook like button is designed as a hand giving "thumbs up". It was originally discussed to have been a star or a plus sign, and during development the feature was referred to as "awesome" instead of "like".[citation needed] It was introduced on 9 February 2009.[5] In February 2016, Facebook introduced reactions - a new way to express peoples emotions to Facebook posts. Some reactions included "Love", "Haha", "Wow", "Sad", or "Angry".
In 2010, as part of a wider redesign of the service, YouTube switched from a star-based rating system to Like/Dislike buttons. Under the previous system, users could rate videos on a scale from 1 to 5 stars; YouTube staff argued that this change reflected common usage of the system, as 2-, 3-, and 4-star ratings were not used as often.[8][9] In 2012, YouTube briefly experimented with replacing the Like and Dislike buttons with a Google+ +1 button.[10]
In 2019, after the backlash from YouTube Rewind 2018, YouTube began considering options to combat "dislike mobs," including an option to completely remove the dislike button.[11] The video is the most disliked video on YouTube, passing the music video for Justin Bieber's "Baby". On November 12, 2021, YouTube announced it will make dislike counts private, with only the content creator being able to view the number of dislikes on the back end, in what the company says is an effort to combat targeted dislike and harassment campaigns and encourage smaller content creators.[12]
Alongside "retweets", Twitter users could "favorite" posts made on the service, indicated by a gold star symbol (). In November 2015, to alleviate user confusion and put the function more in line with other social networks, the "favorite" function was renamed "like", and its button was changed from a star symbol to a heart ().[16]
VK like buttons for posts, comments, media and external sites operate in a different way from Facebook. Liked content doesn't get automatically pushed to the user's wall, but is saved in the (private) Favorites section instead.
The Instagram like button is indicated by a heart symbol. In addition to tapping the heart symbol on a post, users can double tap an image to "like" it. In May 2019, Instagram began tests wherein the number of likes on a user's post is hidden from other users.[17]
The TikTok like button is indicated by a heart symbol, and users can use the like button by double tapping on a post they like, similar to Instagram. Liked content can be accessed via the "Liked" tab on a user's profile.
XWiki, the application wiki and open source collaborative platform, added the Like button in version 12.7. This button allows users to like wiki pages. It's possible to see all liked pages and the Like counter for each page.
Every major redesign such as this one requires some adjustment, and everyone will perceive the changes in their own way. However, there are some elements of this design that just don't seem well thought out. I'm no UI/UX expert, but having two columns of menu buttons on the left, right next to each other, feels like a clumsy, cluttered solution, with so many colorful icons fighting for your attention.
Facebook claims that with the redesign, users will be able to navigate through the app easier and more consistently. This entails a more prominent back button, the ability to view whose post you are engaging on, as well as to better view the link to be clicked, preventing click bait traps.
The new Facebook design reinforces the advocacy. The new design puts the Groups tab on the top of the page as a button. Clicking on it takes you to a newsfeed of updates from your groups, as well as recommendations for other groups you might like.
yay, now it's impossible to use the site! Before this redesign, I had no problems being able to view comments, change log, other files, etc for addons, but now they're just gone... Great job on the design, might wanna rethink it completely!Edit: I just wanna say I use noscript and adblock, could be noscript kicking in, but it's STUPID to require javascript for things like the above. Might want to look into non-intrusive javascript, they did awesome in the past on it.
yay, now it's impossible to use the site! Before this redesign, I had no problems being able to view comments, change log, other files, etc for addons, but now they're just gone... Great job on the design, might wanna rethink it completely!Edit: I just wanna say I use noscript and adblock, could be noscript kicking in, but it's STUPID to require javascript for things like the above. Might want to look into non-intrusive javascript, they did awesome in the past on it.I'm having absolutely no issue browsing the new site with my NoScript on, and it could just be because I have had it whitelisted for a long time now. Almost every webpage out there uses Javascript in some form; the main thing with using NoScript is to simply whitelist the javascripts on sites as you browse them, and you will never have an issue again. And it's not really all that inconvenient...
"The redesign is a welcome development as Facebook was beginning to look a little dated. The screenshots show some big aesthetic changes. Instead of a single feed when a user logs in, the change will see multiple feeds dividing content by several categories, including music and photos. All in all, this will likely encourage users to stay on the site longer," says Pouros.
Google Inc. has been described as functional, powerful, scary, speedy and fun. But beautiful? Hardly ever. googletag.cmd.push(function() googletag.display('div-gpt-ad-1449240174198-2'); ); New CEO Larry Page is trying to change all that, cribbing a note from one of his business role models and competitors, the late Steve Jobs and Apple Inc. Almost immediately after becoming CEO in April, Page ordered a redesign of Google's online properties, attempting to create a unified look and feel that would proclaim "Google," just as the aesthetic character of Apple products renders them instantly recognizable. The universal redesign is the first in the company's 13-year history. Google's new, less-cluttered look debuted with the Google+ social network at the end of June, and is now being phased in to Gmail, Calendar, Documents, Search and other Google sites across the company's online empire. While Google's plans for a wholesale face-lift were overshadowed by the hubbub over the launch of Google+, Page months before had set in motion a crash program by the company's user interface (UI) designers to remake the face of Google. "Larry likes things done fast, so he was like, 'Hey guys, can we completely transform Google's look and feel by the summer?' " said Jon Wiley, the company's lead user experience designer for search. "As designers, we kind of felt like we were the dog that had caught the car." With its geeky, data-driven identity, Google has rarely been lauded for its aesthetics. But with consumers flocking to Apple's iPhones and iPads, and with Facebook launching new products that emphasize look and feel as well as functionality, Google and other Internet companies are increasingly focused on appearance, as well as how they work. "It's really clear that consumers care about (design) now," sai